Review of Asperger(’)s in Love by Maxine Aston
May 16th, 2008Pondered Carrie at1:00 pm....
... who then promptly filed it away underAsperger's Syndrome, Books
Aspergers in Love: Couple Relationships and Family Affairs by Maxine Aston
To make a really ridiculously obvious correction to the TITLE of the freakin’ book before I even begin, the syndrome is correctly spelled Asperger’s Syndrome, with an apostrophe. Not ‘Aspergers’. It just goes downhill from there. I would link to the book but really - don’t buy it. Borrow it and then don’t even ‘forget’ to give it back. No really… return it to the owner when you’re done.
I am an adult female with Asperger’s Syndrome. When my relationship started demonstrating obvious issues with communication, I wanted to get a good idea of how the Asperger’s Syndrome might be affecting it. This book was recommended, so I picked it up. On the positive, the book is packed with information and ideas on where a relationship might break down. As other reviews have said, it IS thought provoking and insightful.
However, that said, I was actually quite disappointed with the book. The book is not critical of the AS individual but the tone of the writing stops just shy of that and most of all, this book doesn’t seem applicable at all to a relationship between an AS female and anyone NT or otherwise.
There is a tone that NT people sometimes take when referring to the behavior of a person with AS. It’s a mixture of the condescending ‘poor AS person, they don’t know how to feel properly’ and a bit of clinical detachment. I was dismayed to find the author writing with that tone. So while the NT reading it might feel like they’ve found a source that gives voice to what they are experiencing, it (ironically) does little to foster actual empathy with the AS person and their actions. As a woman with AS, who was looking for valuable input, I was really put off by it.
I made it through most of the book with a really puzzled look on my face looking for that one paragraph that would make me able to relate - REALLY relate to the AS traits she describes. And then I got to the ONE chapter about AS Women in the back of the book - and EUREKA! I was able to relate to this chapter! At the beginning of this chapter about AS Women, there is a tiny explanation about how writing the book using the words ‘AS Male’ simply made the book more comprehensible. But really? Because I could relate to so much of that one chapter and so little of the rest of the book, I wonder, truly, how much of the rest of the book even applies to a majority of women with AS. And while, perhaps AS women just wasn’t the focus of the book, it’s billed as a book about being in a relationship with AS individuals in general - and it’s not. It’s actually a book about relationships between an AS Male and an NT Female with a footnote about AS Women.












